China has warned against turning outer space into a “battlefield” after the United States confirmed deploying weapons in orbit. This announcement marks a new stage in major powers’ rush for military space capabilities.
“The US has on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending the Joint Force against hostile adversary action,” a US Space Force spokesperson said, without detailing the weapons.
China, Russia Voice Concern
China’s foreign ministry opposed the move, warning against the “weaponisation of outer space, turning it into a battlefield, as well as an arms race there.”
“We urge the US to stop expanding its military capabilities and preparing for war in outer space,” spokesman Guo Jiakun said at a news briefing.
Russia also called for space to remain “free of any weapons” and expressed hope for broad international cooperation toward complete space demilitarisation.
Analysts noted that while Washington’s revelation confirmed an open secret, its timing risks escalating tensions with Beijing and fueling a space weapons race.
US Space Capabilities
The US statement lacked specifics on weapon types and numbers. It defined “space control” as using kinetic and non-kinetic means to contest and control the space domain, affecting adversary capabilities.
Non-kinetic methods could include lasers to blind satellites or electromagnetic/cyber jamming of data links.
For the US, Russia and China—its main geopolitical rivals—pose potential threats to its space interests.
Space militarization dates back to the 1957 space race when the USSR launched Sputnik. Washington and Moscow then began exploring satellite arming and destruction.
Read Also: China hits back at US tech warnings
Initial concerns focused on nuclear weapons in space, but the 1967 Outer Space Treaty banned orbital weapons of mass destruction.
Since then, Russia, the US, China, and India have explored treaty-compliant space warfare, including targeting rival satellites vital for military communications, surveillance, and navigation.
Space law expert Laetitia Cesari noted a “regulatory vacuum” as the 1967 treaty only bans orbital weapons of mass destruction and nuclear arms.
She expects the issue to feature at November’s UN disarmament meeting.
Song Zhongping, a Hong Kong-based military commentator and ex-Chinese army instructor, told AFP the US announcement was “no surprise” as its weapons were “long an open secret.”
“The US used to keep it ambiguous but has now gone public, showing it’s no longer hiding,” he added.
The US move will likely bolster Moscow and Beijing’s push for stricter space weapon controls, Cesari said.
Nations’ responses to the US confirmation remain uncertain, as does the potential for increased space conflict or demilitarization efforts.
The US has long viewed Russia and China as space threats, citing China’s military modernization and Russia’s view of space as a warfighting domain.
Attention will likely shift to November’s UN disarmament meeting, where space weapons are a key agenda item.
Read Also: Jakarta Airport Shut, Belgium Arrests Chinese Chip Spy
Given the regulatory gaps, preventing a space arms race is unclear, but the US confirmation has undeniably opened a new chapter in space militarization debates.
The US Space Force confirmed its weapons’ offensive and defensive capabilities but provided no specifics.
This opacity concerns experts who fear the US seeks space dominance without considering consequences.
China has vowed not to ignore the US deployment, with Song Zhongping stating its response will mirror US actions.
The US has confirmed deploying offensive and defensive space weapons but remains vague on details.
China and Russia expressed concern, with China opposing space weaponization and Russia advocating a weapon-free space.
Non-kinetic weapons like lasers or electromagnetic jamming could be deployed in space.
The US views Russia and China as space threats, deploying weapons to deter adversaries.
The US has deployed on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending against hostile actions, according to a US Space Force statement.
Leave a Reply